One of our articles:
Ljubic A, Trajkovski V, Stankovic B. Strabismus, Refractive Errors and Nystagmus in Children and Young Adults with Down Syndrome. Ophthalmic Genet 2011;32:204-11.
was cited here:
Author: Ravikumar, Ayeswarya PhD 1*; Benoit, Julia S. PhD 1,2; Morrison, Kelsie B. OD, FAAO 1; Marsack, Jason D. PhD, FAAO 1; Anderson, Heather A. OD, PhD, FAAO 1
Institution: (1)College of Optometry, University of Houston, Houston, Texas
(2)Texas Institute for Measurement, Evaluation and Statistics, University of Houston, Houston, Texas * aravikum@central.uh.edu
Title:
Repeatability of Monocular Acuity Testing in Adults with and without Down Syndrome.[Article]
Source: Optometry and Vision Science. 95(3):202-211, March 2018.
Abstract
Institution: (1)College of Optometry, University of Houston, Houston, Texas
(2)Texas Institute for Measurement, Evaluation and Statistics, University of Houston, Houston, Texas * aravikum@central.uh.edu
Title:
Repeatability of Monocular Acuity Testing in Adults with and without Down Syndrome.[Article]
Source: Optometry and Vision Science. 95(3):202-211, March 2018.
Abstract
PURPOSE: Individuals with Down syndrome may experience greater difficulty reliably performing visual acuity (VA) tests because of intellectual disability and limitations in visual quality. This study evaluated the repeatability of acuity (Bailey-Lovie [BL] and HOTV) in subjects with and without Down syndrome.
METHODS: High-contrast VA was measured in both eyes of 30 subjects with Down syndrome (mean, 30 years; range, 18 to 50 years) and 24 control subjects without Down syndrome (mean, 29 years; range, 18 to 50 years). In the Down syndrome group, 23 subjects performed BL, and 7 subjects performed HOTV. All control subjects performed both BL and HOTV, but for HOTV analysis, only seven age-matched control subjects were included. For each eye, subjects performed VA three times on different charts (computer controlled, single-line display) until five total letters were missed on each chart. A repeated-measure ANOVA was used to compare the acuity measures between groups.
RESULTS: The average logMAR VA for subjects with Down syndrome was approximately six lines worse than the control subjects (BL: Down syndrome = right eye: 0.51 +/- 0.16, left eye: 0.53 +/- 0.18; control = right eye: -0.06 +/- 0.06, left eye: -0.06 +/- 0.08, P < .0001; HOTV: Down syndrome = right eye: 0.47 +/- 0.19, left eye: 0.46 +/- 0.16; control: right eye = -0.11 +/- 0.09, left eye: -0.07 +/- 0.07, P < .001). Bailey-Lovie VA repeatability (1.96 * Sw * [square root]2) was 0.13 logMAR (6.5 letters) for Down syndrome and 0.09 logMAR (4.5 letters) for control subjects. HOTV VA repeatability was 0.16 logMAR (eight letters) for both Down syndrome and control subjects.
CONCLUSIONS: Despite poorer acuity in individuals with Down syndrome, repeatability of VA measurements was comparable to control subjects for both BL and HOTV techniques.
No comments:
Post a Comment